|
|
|
FRESHWATER FISHERIES SUMMIT RESULTS
SEBRING, FLORIDA
September 24, 2005
1. Lake Istokpoga nuisance vegetation control.
• Responsibilities
– Water Management District—water levels, local aquatic vegetation contracts.
– Department of Environmental Protection—statewide vegetation control polices; nuisance vegetation; water quality. Law states nuisance plants must be controlled at lowest possible levels, if money available.
– County—local contract applications. Lake Istokpoga Advisory Committee (Dec. 8, Sebring).
– Public—express concerns and preferences to involved parties.
– FWC—we are a commenting agency relative to impacts on fish and wildlife, local issue team of biologists coordinate input.
• The Problem
– Exotic Hydrilla: Previous chemical control no longer effective, due to the plant adapting.
– Research need for new control techniques.
– Tussock development and movement, sedimentation.
– Homeowners harvesting plants clearing shore.
– User conflicts (e.g., PWC).
– Concerns about product warning labels (EPA) when and where applied (fish consumption/swimming).
• The Solution
– Generate research mandate.
– Consider mechanical harvest.
– Collaborative, well-directed, informed public input (e.g., LEAD Lake Environmental Action Drive, Defenders of Crooked Lake).
– Education and information dissemination.
– Lake Istokpoga Management Committee (County Advisory) would benefit from community input (e.g., SOS, Camp Owners, Guides).
– Drawdowns—but better follow-up needed and transplanting.
– Create a mechanism for involved citizens to get together (e.g., send participants an invite to e-mail a central group [SOS] about further follow-up).
– Get involved with Regional Planning Counsels for growth management issues.
2. Mechanism to move public comments up the chain from creel clerks and local comments to the administration.
• Problem
– It was discussed that concerns are often mentioned to creel clerks, officers or biologists on the water.
• Solution
– Develop a mechanism to pass common or especially important observations and concerns up to a level where they can be acted on appropriately.
3. Hurricane issue (e.g., Istokpoga)
• Problem
– Hurricanes last year undermined a perimeter road. Reports indicated that it a worse hurricane could drain the lake.
• Solution
– County is responsible for roads. The lake normally fluctuated much more than under current regulation. Fluctuation is better for the lake and at this point we don’t anticipate a major problem. But other agencies have the lead.
4. Regulatory issues (e.g., Istokpoga slot).
• Problem
– Slot and bag considered differently by individual anglers, guides, tournaments etc.
– Crappie concerns.
– Loss of shiners (cast netting for bait), habitat loss and trophic shift to bullhead and bluegill.
• Solutions
– Citizens advisory group representing all interests.
– Use FWC rules review process to submit recommendations and have diverse support willing to attend Commission meetings.
PHOTOS OF THE SUMMITS ARE AVAILABLE ON-LINE



